[common] Bump UMF to early 0.11 version, from main #2596
Conversation
|
changed to draft as I should probably also include macos fix already oneapi-src/unified-memory-framework#1052 |
lukaszstolarczuk
force-pushed
the
bump-umf-0.11
branch
from
5eabce7 to
3ad9483
Compare
|
I'm afraid there's an issue with hwloc, probably failing because of UMF change - investigating... |
lukaszstolarczuk
force-pushed
the
bump-umf-0.11
branch
from
3ad9483 to
9ee874c
Compare
|
hwloc issue introduced on UMF's main is being reverted, waiting for this PR: oneapi-src/unified-memory-framework#1056 |
lukaszstolarczuk
force-pushed
the
bump-umf-0.11
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b20d26d to
a5b080d
Compare
lukaszstolarczuk
force-pushed
the
bump-umf-0.11
branch
from
a5b080d to
97c7c00
Compare
It includes i.a. MacOS fix for compiler.
lukaszstolarczuk
force-pushed
the
bump-umf-0.11
branch
from
97c7c00 to
d193046
Compare
|
UMF required fixes are included, intel/llvm testing is passing now, so I guess it's ready for review. |
|
@lukaszstolarczuk should we wait for oneapi-src/unified-memory-framework#1063? |
TBH, I don't think this one is neccessary for this update. This is not the final release v0.11.0, more UMF bumps in UR incoming 😉 |
|
@kbenzie, do you think we could merge this one soon? |
There are issues with Windows runners on intel/llvm so we'll need to wait until those are resolved. |
Pulls in changes from: * oneapi-src/unified-runtime#2614 * oneapi-src/unified-runtime#2596 * oneapi-src/unified-runtime#2620 --------- Co-authored-by: Kenneth Benzie (Benie) <[email protected]>
5 participants
intel/llvm testing: intel/llvm#16749